IQdocApplied AI for legal.

Market research · Legal AI funding

Who raised what in legal AI

Every AI-native legal tech company we could find with a disclosed funding figure — 95 of them — ranked by total capital raised, with the market each one sells into, the year it started, and whatever traction it has actually put on the record. Sort any column, filter by segment, region or disclosure, and click a row for the caveats.

Compiled August 25, 2026 · figures in USD · sources listed per row

Companion page: what these companies actually sell — every named product, grouped by type and tagged with who buys it.

Tracked capital
$6.20BTracked capital
Companies ranked
95Companies ranked
Valued at $1B+
5Valued at $1B+
Disclose any revenue
14 of 95Disclose any revenue
Disclose nothing at all
39%Disclose nothing at all
Latest roundConfidence
Revenue or ARR figure — 14 of 95
Growth rate only — 23 more
Customer count only — 21 more
Nothing disclosed — 37

How this was put together

What counts as AI-native

The company's core product is AI applied to legal work, and it was built that way from the start. Practice-management and CLM platforms that added an AI layer sit in the second tab. Fintech AML, security compliance and brand-protection tools were checked and left out; Norm Ai is in because it sells regulatory work as legal work and launched its own law firm.

What "raised" means

Cumulative disclosed equity since founding, in USD. Debt is excluded unless flagged (Spellbook's total includes a $40M facility, marked in its row). Non-USD rounds are converted at announcement-date rates. Where a company states a total that differs from the sum of its announced rounds, both are shown.

Why revenue is a column, not the ranking

Only 14 of 95 have put a dollar revenue figure on the record, and those 14 span four reporting years, mix ARR with marketplace revenue, and include one outside estimate. Another 23 give a growth rate with no base to apply it to, and 21 give a customer count in units that do not compare — law firms, seats, end clients of their clients, registered users. Ranking on that would invent precision.

Confidence

High — the total is stated by the company or a primary report. Medium — arithmetic across announced rounds, no contradiction found. Low — rounds undisclosed, sources conflict, or the figure is a ceiling rather than a draw. Roughly a third of this list is medium or low; treat those as directional.

Known gaps

Korea, Japan (beyond LegalOn), China, India (beyond SpotDraft), the Middle East and Africa are almost certainly under-covered — English-language funding press barely reaches them. Founding years are the weakest column overall; most aggregators paywall them and several companies predate the product they're now known for.

What a funding lens cannot see

Ranking by capital raised systematically hides companies that did not raise much. The clearest example is Courtroom5, which has taken roughly $420,000 since 2017 — mostly grants — and is nonetheless the most substantial software product built for people representing themselves, and one of the connectors in Google's Gemini Enterprise for Legal launch. It does not appear below because it never cleared the funding bar. It is in the product catalogue, and the omission is worth remembering whenever this page is read as a map of the market rather than a map of the money.

Sources

Each row links to its primary source: Artificial Lawyer, LawNext, company newsrooms, TechCrunch, Law.com, Sifted and Crunchbase News, among others.

Funding, valuation and revenue figures are as disclosed by the companies or their press coverage and are not independently audited. Nothing here is legal or investment advice.